|
Rene Magritte, Not to Be Reproduced |
We have noted that
The Double can be read productively in light of Freud's theory of the uncanny. We have also discussed the ways in which the text can be understood as more than just a "descent into madness" narrative, that is, as an exploration of the relationship between the individual and the social body and as a social critique of imperial Russian culture in particular. How do these two strains relate? Is it possible to argue that the insights embedded in Dostoevsky's text can only be accessed through the uncanny?